The introduction of the IFRS 16 lease accounting standards saw $3 trillion worth of assets move to balance sheets amongst listed companies alone. Private companies have also seen their balance sheets grow as a result of the new standards.
While having a sizeable book of assets and liabilities can help companies secure debt and other sources of finance and investment, it’s not necessarily the best way to unlock capital and ensure the financial stability of a company. And with the added complexity of calculating an incremental borrowing rate (IBR) on leased assets, inaccuracies can lead to material changes to a company’s accounts. This article outlines how IBRs impact a company’s balance sheet risk and what companies should do to mitigate their risk.
As the rate used to determine the interest a company would pay if the asset was capital expenditure instead of a lease over the term, it’s the most important component of lease accounting to get right. Any adjustments in a lease require modification to the corresponding IBR. Therefore, it’s important companies have an IBR calculation methodology that’s not only accurate but easily repeatable. Ideally, a centralised system of storing and updating lease data would be implemented not only to help in calculating the IBR but to ensure compliance with the IFRS 16 lease accounting standards as well.
According to Deloitte, for the average mid-cap company, a 1 per cent increase in a company’s IBR can result in a 5 per cent increase in asset-liability and a 39 per cent increase in interest costs.
Banks and credit agencies are now beginning to look at how they can align their assessment frameworks with the IFRS 16 standards, which presents an opportunity to proactively negotiate your current agreements. The process may be a lengthy one, not only due to the complexity of changing frameworks but due to the need for alignment across banks and agencies. In early 2020, for example, rating agency Fitch announced how they would be dealing with lease accounting under their credit metrics, but it differed from Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s approach.
The key difference — while nuanced across operating profit, expense classification, lease liabilities, financial leverage, lease liability, and cash flow — is that Fitch typically defaults to the US GAAP model while Moody’s and Standard & Poors makes adjustments. Given the time it will take to align the approaches of the major credit agencies, it gives businesses the opportunity to provide their input to their finance providers while proactively addressing their balance sheet risk now.
When managed proactively with strong systems and processes, a company can effectively mitigate the financial risks associated with calculating its IBR as part of its broader leasing strategy.
Three key actions companies can take today to reduce their balance sheet risk include:
If you’re looking for guidance on managing your IBR, the structure of your leases and whether your lease accounting systems are delivering the strongest commercial results possible for your organisation, click here to learn more about Quadrent’s lease analytics and IBR benchmarking portal.